Loading...
Loading...
본 프로젝트는 특정 역사관이나 국가를 비판 또는 옹호하는 것을 목적으로 하지 않으며, 세계 각국 교과서 및 공식 견해의 기술 차이를 객관적으로 병치·제시합니다.
각국의 관점 요약
Diaoyu Dao and its affiliated islands have been China's inherent territory since ancient times, and China has undisputed sovereignty over them.
According to historical records, the Diaoyu Islands were already included in China's navigation and maritime defenses as early as the Ming Dynasty in the 14th century, and were even listed as Chinese territory on maps and official documents during the Qing Dynasty. In 1895, just before the end of the Sino-Japanese War, Japan secretly and illegally "annexed" these islands, which had long been controlled by China. This is an act of usurpation that is not consistent with international law.
Under the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations at the end of World War II, all Chinese territory stolen by Japan should be returned, including the Diaoyu Islands. However, after the war, the United States put these islands under its own administrative authority, and in 1972 it "returned" administrative authority to Japan, an act that ignored China's sovereignty. Since the possibility of undersea resources was pointed out in 1968, Japan has strengthened its territorial claims, but the Chinese government has consistently refused to recognize Japan's claims and maintained a firm stance to protect its sovereignty.
이 비교는 각국의 공식 또는 널리 사용되는 역사 교과서의 일반적인 기술에 기반합니다. 번역 과정에서 미세한 뉘앙스가 변할 수 있지만, 주요 사건의 인식 방식, 기술 순서, 강조점의 차이를 드러내는 것을 목적으로 합니다. 특히 "China"와 "Japan" 사이에서는 사건의 명칭과 발생 배경에 대한 해석에 현저한 차이가 나타납니다.